Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Inculpatory Statements Against Penal Interest: <em>State v. Parris</em> Goes Too Far
This article first demonstrates that courts historically did not trust penal interest statements in general, and that courts were extremely suspicious of any statements by a third party that implicated the defendant. Since Washington adopted Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) verbatim, this article
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 15 U.S.C. § 16 — Judgments#567840
- 12 U.S.C. § 1956 — Criminal penalty#564205
- 28 U.S.C. § 2519 — Conclusiveness of judgment#556732
- Truth, error and criminal law : an essay in legal epistemology#956593
- Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (by Larry Alexander et al.)#747495
Record · ID 1019904
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive