Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Paternity Determinations in Washington: Balancing the Interests of All Parties
The state and all parties in a paternity proceeding may benefit from a more efficient, administrative approach to paternity adjudication if certain procedural safeguards are assured the defendant. Section II of this Comment sketches the development of common-law and statutory rights of paternity act
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JR176(2), Application for Judicial Review [2026] NICA 27 (28 May 2026)#261103
- Challenging the Infallibility of DNA Evidence: A Call for Reform in the Criminal Justice System#259102
- At women's expense: state power and the politics of fetal rights#720212
- When algorithms testify: artificial intelligence-driven DNA analysis, evidentiary standards, and criminal justice reform.#281582
- Reproductive Rights (Amendment) Bill 2026#186320
Record · ID 1019905
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive