Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Dismantling the Exclusionary Rule: <em>United States v. Leon</em> and the Courts of Washington—Should Good Faith Excuse Bad Acts?
This Note will review briefly the history of the exclusionary rule under fourth amendment jurisprudence, with special emphasis given to the purposes the rule has traditionally been thought to serve. The significance of the Leon decision then will be examined in light of the emergence in Washington o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Selective Judicial Activism in the Equal Protection Context: Democracy, Distrust, and Deconstruction#1019411
- LETTING KATZ OUT OF THE BAG: COGNITIVE FREEDOM AND FOURTH AMENDMENT FIDELITY#228232
- 22 U.S.C. § 809 — Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, § 2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159#580883
- A Concerted Effort: How the Roberts Court Demolished Anti-Gerrymandering Protections#425782
- 33 U.S.C. § 1001 — Repealed. Pub. L. 96–478, § 12, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2303#585686
Record · ID 1019916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive