Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Monopsony and Backward Integration: Section 2 Violations in the Buyer's Market
This Comment will focus on the application of section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act to actions in the buyer's market. After briefly reviewing general antitrust law, this Comment will explore the status of antitrust claims in the buyer's market under both section 1 and section 2. The necessary eleme
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Debunking the Purchaser Welfare Account of Section 2 of the Sherman Act: How Harvard Brought Us a Total Welfare Standard and Why We Should Keep It#1148974
- One-Way Networks, Two-Way Networks, Compatibility, and Antitrust#942311
- 47 U.S.C. § 313 — Application of antitrust laws to manufacture, sale, and trade in radio apparatus#597970
- On the Very Idea of a Robust Alternative#755419
- At the Junction of Consumer Protection: Dual Role of Data Protection in EU Competition Law#462079
Record · ID 1019990
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive