Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Balancing the Right to Confrontation and the Need to Protect Child Sexual Abuse Victims: Are Statutes Authorizing Televised Testimony Serving Their Purpose?
This Comment begins by providing a brief outline of the procedures regulating the use of televised testimony. Next, against the larger backdrop of the history of the right to confrontation, Part III addresses the treatment of televised testimony as hearsay. This section presents a recent Maryland
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Child sexual abuse, body image and tale of the ant#312021
- Self-Defense without Overreach: How Status of Forces Agreements Address the Legal Gaps in Article 51#348823
- Increasing understanding of the barriers to military sexual trauma-related reporting and treatment seeking in Canada.#418644
- Enforcing the Sexual Laws: An Agenda for Action#774719
- Co-producing an ethics framework for participatory autism research: process, principles, and implications#16124
Record · ID 1019995
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive