Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
<em>In re Grant</em>: Where Does Washington Stand on Artificial Nutrition and Hydration?
The Washington Supreme Court in In re Grantsought to determine whether life sustaining treatment could be legally withheld from a terminally ill, non-comatose, incompetent individual. In its December 1987 slip opinion, a majority of the court expanded on its previous decisions empowering third part
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- OFF ON A LIMB: DECISION DYNAMICS AND SYSTEM BURDEN IN AMPUTATION CARE#929480
- 42 U.S.C. § 11002 — Substances and facilities covered and notification#590131
- 7 U.S.C. § 1926c — Water and waste facility loans and grants to alleviate health risks#561396
- 25 U.S.C. § 1646 — Authorization for emergency contract health services#582442
- 22 U.S.C. § 7710 — Suspension and termination of assistance#577996
Record · ID 1020024
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive