Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
The Need for Revisiting the Imposition of Bad Faith Liability: <em>Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kallevig</em>
This Note posits two recommendations. First, in order to harmonize the bad faith standards applied in Kallevig and Gingrich, the Kallevig reasonable justification standard should be applied in situations involving questions similar to those confronted by the Gingrich court. Second, this Note contend
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Critical Race Realism: Re-Claiming the Antidiscrimination Principle through the Doctrine of Good Faith in Contract Law#494649
- What’s the Point of Efficiency? On Heath’s Market Failures Approach#704309
- The limits of conventional justification: inductive risk and industry bias beyond conventionalism#757771
- Are Moral Error Theorists Intellectually Vicious?#741626
- Fairness and Utility in Tort Theory#734092
Record · ID 1020051
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive