Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Don't Throw the Price Waterhouse Baby Out With the Bath Water: Age Discrimination and the Direct Evidence/Mixed Motive Puzzle
This Comment examines why Washington should place a higher burden on employers in direct evidence and mixed motive age discrimination cases. Because Washington courts follow federal case law in interpreting state anti-discrimination legislation, Section II examines relevant federal statutes and the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Employer Neighborhoods and Racial Discrimination#21649
- 15 U.S.C. § 775 — Sex discrimination; enforcement; other legal remedies#567389
- Sky Remains Intact: Why Allowing Subgroup Evidence is Consistent with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act#494922
- Moreau on Discrimination and Wrong#83183
- Employed persons by reason for discrimination in the current job, size of the local unit and economic activity (2021)#817264
Record · ID 1020066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive