Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Two Promises, Two Propositions: The Wheeler-Howard Act as a Reconciliation of the Indian Law Civil War
This Article argues that current Supreme Court reasoning concerning the reserved powers of state governments undermines Supreme Court reasoning with respect to the retained powers of tribal governments. This Article also argues that tribal assertions of power over nonmembers constitute "state action
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Indian Tribes, Civil Rights, and Federal Courts#1022098
- Text, Context, and Human Rights-based Interpretations by Domestic Courts#84279
- 25 U.S.C. § 3614 — Tribal judicial conferences#582974
- Role of Caste and Ideology in Indian Politics#762979
- The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy#49094
Record · ID 1020069
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive