Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
What Shelter Remains for Builder/Vendors Under RCW 4.16.300-320 After <em>Pfeifer v. Bellingham</em>?
This Note criticizes Pfeifer's incomplete resolution of the apparent conflict between Wash. Rev. Code §§ 4.16.300-.320 and § 353 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and calls for a reconsideration of the case. The Note is premised on the general validity of statutes of repose and the merit of the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 30 U.S.C. § 875 — Emergency shelters; construction; contents; implementation plans#584536
- 7 U.S.C. § 2353 — Testimony in Plant Variety Protection Office cases#560952
- 16 U.S.C. § 90e-2 — Map and legal description, filing with Congressional committees; correction of errors; applicability of Wilderness Act#572742
- 16 U.S.C. § 695k — Congressional declaration of policy for preservation of habitat for migratory waterfowl and prevention of depredations on agricultural crops#569939
- CVE-2020-37278 — HIGH 8.7#1176108
Record · ID 1020081
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive