Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
Recovered Memories of Alleged Sexual Abuse: An Analysis of the Theory of Repressed Memories Under the Washington Rules of Evidence
This Comment explores whether testimony regarding repressed memories is admissible under Washington rules of evidence. This Comment concludes that the process of repression and accurate recall of memories has not been proven to be a sufficiently reliable and trustworthy phenomenon to justify admissi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reconsidering the ethics of cosmopolitan memory: In the name of difference and memories to-come#79915
- Asymmetries in prior conviction reasoning: Truth suppression effects in child protection contexts#712519
- The Role of Assurance in Judgment and Memory#740052
- The Verifiability of Recovered Memories of Abuse#276670
- On Judging Sex/Gender—A Case of Epistemic Domination: A Reply to Talia Mae Bettcher#94348
Record · ID 1020121
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive