Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
metadata only
The "Presence Is an Essential Function" Myth: The ADA's Trapdoor for the Chronically Ill
In nearly all cases, long-term chronic illnesses satisfy the ADA's broad definition of disability. However, when these illnesses begin to cause absenteeism, the "presence is an essential function" rule effectively denies protection to the victims of these illnesses, as they are no longer "qualified
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Housing Adaptations and Mobility Devices#881587
- Chronic Absence as a Public Health Priority: A Framework for Coordinated Action.#781423
- Self-as-doer and health promotion for patients with chronic disease.#476736
- Improving the Health and Social Participation of People With Disabilities From Underrepresented Groups Post COVID#864932
- Well-being, Opportunity, and Selecting for Disability#766539
Record · ID 1020151
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive