SocArXiv
metadata only
LLM measurements that agree with human coders overall can still distort specific effects
computational-social-scienceeconomicslarge-language-modelspolitical-sciencepreprintsocial-sciencesociology
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in the social sciences as surrogates for human coders. Standard practice validates them by their correspondence with human measurements of the same stimuli using statistics like correlation. However, overall correspondence can conceal biases that
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Language Models Substantially Compress Well-Being Inequality but Largely Preserve Its Socioeconomic Structure#1117767
- LLM measurements that agree with human coders overall can still distort specific effects#1016124
- Population Fidelity: Evaluating Population Representativeness in LLMs#1131095
- Self-reported archetypes and behavioral failures in Large Language Models#1110396
- The TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline for studies using large language models#359601
Record · ID 1020737
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive