PhilArchive
open access
Rational framing effects and morally valid reasons
I argue that the scope of rational framing effects may be broader than Bermúdez assumes. Even in many “canonical experiments,” the explanation of the judgment reversals or shifts may refer to reasons, including moral ones. Referring to the Asian disease paradigm (ADP), I describe how non-consequentialist reasons related to fairness and the distinction between doing and allowing may help explain and justify the typical pattern of choices in the cases like ADP.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: 'Theory of mind' and moral judgment#745620
- ICU triage decisions and biases about time and identity#732138
- Minds, Brains, and Desert: On the relevance of neuroscience for retributive punishment#771388
- Experimental dataset on public bad dilemmas: effects of cost level and framing on decision-making#120723
- Experimental dataset on public bad dilemmas: effects of cost level and framing on decision-making#120722
Record · ID 102145
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive