Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
Assumed Sane
In 2014, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held in Matter of G-G-S-that a noncitizen’s mental health status at the time of an offense is irrelevant to determining whether the offense is a “particularly serious crime” for immigration purposes. Since a “particularly serious crime” is a bar to asy
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mental Health Courts and the Reduction of Recidivism: An Umbrella Review [Psychology Series Topic 168]#177909
- Relación entre estrés migratorio y salud mental en inmigrantes venezolanos atendidos en el Hospital Especializado en Salud Mental Honorio Delgado-Hideyo Noguchi, 2025#292943
- Factors that influence access to primary healthcare services for migrants with a preexisting mental ill-health diagnosis: a scoping review#368973
- The Problem of Interpreting Cluster B Personality Disorders: at the Intersection of Psychiatry and Morality#731020
- 38 U.S.C. § 5501A — Beneficiaries’ rights in mental competence determinations#587710
Record · ID 1021754
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive