Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
Manuel v. City of Joliet: Pursuing a Claim Under the Fourth Amendment
In Justice Kagan’s majority opinion in Manuel v. City of Joliet, the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment governs a claim sought under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 for unlawful pretrial detention, even after the start of the legal process. Following the “broad consensus among the circuit courts,” the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What is the impact of culture on legal theory?#1178021
- The Second Amendment is History: Ninth Circuit Takes Originalist Approach in Finding No Right to Public Carry in Young v. Hawaii#1148355
- Alleyne on the Ground: Factfinding that Limits Eligibility for Probation or Parole Release#1019506
- <i>A.A. v. J.M.</i>: The Virginia Court of Appeals Excludes a Whole Class of Prospective Adoptive Parents#281906
- A selection of leading cases in the common law : with notes.#334255
Record · ID 1021771
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive