Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
State Water Planning: Theory v. Practice in Texas
The essay shows that while the Texas water planning process is valu- able and important, its execution in practice is often flawed, resulting in over-estimates of the gap between projected demand and supply; new supply costs; lost opportunities for resolving real near-term needs through cost-effecti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 42 U.S.C. § 300j-19e — Water infrastructure and workforce investment#594806
- 42 U.S.C. § 1962-4 — Implementation of water resources principles and requirements#593434
- 42 U.S.C. § 10303 — Water resources research and technology institutes#590235
- 43 U.S.C. § 485h-1 — Administration of repayment contracts and long-term contracts to furnish water; renewal and conversion; credit for payments; right to available water supply; rates; construction component#596520
- 42 U.S.C. § 8253 — Energy and water management requirements#590753
Record · ID 1021798
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive