Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
The Comparative Institutions Approach to Wildlife Governance
This Article develops a comparative institutions approach to wildlife governance by examining the property rights to the habitat and the stocks of wild populations. The approach is based on the transaction cost and property rights approach and lies primarily in the traditions of Coase, Barzel, Ostro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Wildlife Trade Governance and Zoonosis: Missing Link From Forest to Market Place#442117
- Concern for wild animal suffering and environmental ethics: What are the limits of the disagreement?#709514
- Monograph Available: Toolkit to Address Free-ranging Domestic Cats on Agency Lands Managed for Native Wildlife and Ecosystem Health#366866
- Applying the ecosystem approach to global bioethics: building on the Leopold legacy#91169
- 16 U.S.C. § 567c — Authorization of appropriation for cooperation in acquisition and management of State forests#570276
Record · ID 1021861
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive