Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
The Press, National Security, and Civil Discourse: How a Federal Shield Law Could Reaffirm Media Credibility in an Era of “Fake News”
The Constitution expressly provides protection for the freedom of the press. Yet there is one area in which the press is not so free: the freedom to refuse disclosing confidential sources when subpoenaed by the federal government. Currently, there is no federal reporter’s privilege. The Supreme Cour
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Dimensions of a Journalist's Shield—First Amendment Protection for the Constitutionality of News Sources Against Requests for Court-Ordered Disclosure in Civil Cases#1019894
- Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment#178457
- Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment#178456
- Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment#178455
- Search Engines and Free Speech Coverage#777039
Record · ID 1021916
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive