Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
An Historical Overview of Judicial Selection in Texas
Americans have struggled since colonial times with the notion that judges should be independent, yet accountable to the people. The tension inherent between these two concepts has manifested itself throughout this nation's history in the conflict over whether judges should be elected by the people o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 42 U.S.C. § 14921 — Accreditation or approval required in order to provide adoption services in cases subject to the Convention#589297
- JuDDGES (Judicial Decision Data Gathering, Encoding and Sharing) DMP CHIST-ERA#264358
- Democracy and the Death of Knowledge#1019366
- President’s Column (2015) 51 Page 87#1115430
- 42 U.S.C. § 3606 — Discrimination in the provision of brokerage services#592677
Record · ID 1022047
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive