Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
The Unfortunate Faith: A Solution to the Unwarranted Reliance Upon Eyewitness Testimony
The purpose of this Comment is to argue for the mandatory admission of expert testimony on eyewitness testimony in criminal trials with a jury as the finder of fact. Juries have a preference for direct testimonial evidence."8 But, the impact of direct eyewitness testimony is often misleading to juro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Rational People Obstinately Hold onto Irrational Beliefs: A New Approach#112405
- Brentano's Concept of Intentional Inexistence#712584
- Reply to Eros Corazza#90864
- When statistical evidence is not specific enough#720158
- Jeunes : les stigmatisations de l'apparence#337684
Record · ID 1022071
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive