Texas A&M Law Scholarship
metadata only
Practical Effects of the Sutton Decision: Mitigation, Deference, and the EEOC
This Article will focus on the Court's decision in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., which addressed mitigation of disabilities under the ADA and the accompanying regulations and Interpretive Guidance issued by the EEOC.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Chaplin v Information Commissioner & Anor [2026] UKFTT 838 (GRC) (09 June 2026)#271461
- Chaplin v Information Commissioner & Anor [2026] UKFTT 1117 (GRC) (04 August 2026)#426414
- S.H.E. v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Ors (Approved) [2026] IEHC 464 (13 July 2026)#366147
- Mr D Lee v Ford Retail Ltd T/a TrustFord (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination) [2026] UKET 6001387/2026 (26 March 2026)#252593
- A.H.O. v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Anor (Approved) [2026] IEHC 469 (14 July 2026)#366148
Record · ID 1022096
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive