Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan
metadata only
The Concept of Biblical Authority in the Face of Textual Error Facts: A Theological Discussion
The field of Textual Criticism of the Bible has highlighted that various OT and NT manuscripts contain textual errors in the original apographs. These errors indicate a problem: in the face of various existing textual errors, does the Bible still have authority? Opponents of Biblical authority concl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Historically Regulated Theological Synthesis#721693
- La structure du _Commentaire de l’Évangile de Jean_ de saint Thomas d’Aquin. Puissance, lumière et gloire (_virtus, lux_ et _gloria_). Travaux doctoraux de 2017, complétés d’une préface de Jean-Pierre Torrell datant de 2019#695625
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Biblical Scholarship: Opportunities and Challenges to Textual and Theological Inquiry#693545
- Thomas Aquinas: Selected Commentaries on the New Testament edited by Jason C. Paone#701366
- From First Cause to Covenant — 39#204026
Record · ID 1025189
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive