PhilArchive
open access
In Defense of Natural Religion
The dominance of the Abrahamic tradition in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion has led some to call for greater exploration of alternatives to the traditional conception of God, such as Pantheism, Ultimism, and Axiarchism. While we think this call for alternatives is important, we go in a different direction. Rather than explore and defend alternative conceptions of God, we defend a range of fairly traditional but non-religious conceptions of God. This range of views, from deism to philosophical theism, enjoys a variety of benefits over its religious competitors and deserves greater attention.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Cross-Cultural Perspective on God's Personhood#101851
- Cusanus on the Doctrine of the Image of God: Human Mind as the Living Image, Equality, and Identity in Difference#730489
- Why Christianity Is Anti-Personalist#82552
- Theodicy as Existential Inquiry: Freedom, Suffering, and the Radical Respect of God#105964
- Das Eine in uns und seine Erweckung: Das Fundament der Henologie des Platonikers Proklos#695352
Record · ID 102800
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive