ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Desensitizers in Reducing Post Tooth Preparation Sensitivity for a Fixed Dental Prosthesis
The main purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three kinds of commercially available desensitizing agents: Gluma, Sheildforce plus, and Telio CS desensitizers in reducing the pre- and post-cementation sensitivity for full coverage restorations.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effectiveness of Sealed In-office Bleaching Technique: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial#874387
- Effect of Different Irrigation Solutions on Postoperative Pain and Lesion Healing#813818
- Clinical Efficacy of Using Bioactive Desensitizer Gel#901213
- Treatment of Tooth Sensitivity With the Use of Biorepair Toothpaste#992547
- Ability of Four Toothpastes to Remove Plaque#1127427
Record · ID 1029756
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive