ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Admission, Triage, and Discharge Criteria for Oncological Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
This study will create one agreed set of rules to help doctors decide which people with cancer should be treated in an intensive care unit (ICU), and when they are well enough to leave it. An ICU is a hospital ward for people who are very sick and need close watching and life support. Why the researchers are doing this study Hospitals do not agree on when a person with cancer should go to the ICU. Because of this, some people who could recover are turned away. Others get treatments that cannot help them and may add to their suffering. These choices are harder than for people without cancer. Doctors must weigh the sudden illness, the type of cancer, how well the cancer is responding to treatment, how strong the person is day to day, and what matters most to the person. Cancer care has improved a lot, and many people with cancer now recover well after ICU care. Current rules do not reflect this. How the study will work No new medicine or treatment will be tested, and no patients will take part. Instead, cancer and critical care experts will vote to agree on the rules. This is called a Delphi process. A steering group of 12 to 14 experts will plan the project. They will read the published research and write draft statements about ICU care for people with cancer. The researchers will then invite 30 to 40 experts from around the world to vote on these statements. Participants will be doctors with long experience in cancer care, critical care, or emergency care. Taking part is voluntary. Participants will not know who the other voters are, so no one person can sway the group. Participants will vote in online surveys. They will rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) and answer some multiple-choice questions. There will be at least three rounds of voting. After each round, participants will see how the group voted as a whole. The steering group will reword statements that did not reach agreement, and participants will vote again. The r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Multicenter Intensivist Weekend Scheduling Study#915198
- Supportive Care Delivered by Telemedicine to Cancer Patients at Home#804960
- Using Whole-Person-Care Guide in Patients Receiving Care for Cancer or Complications From Cancer Treatment#906156
- Impact of the Paramedic Announced Consultation on the Use of Patient Care With Cancer and Treated With Chemotherapy#1031877
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Electronic Medical Transfer Tool to Improve Communication During Transfers From ICU#1057697
Record · ID 1029939
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive