ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single _ Drill Vs Full Sequence Guided Implant Placement
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the accuracy of single-drill (pilot-guided) computer-guided implant surgery versus full-sequence computer-guided dental implant placement. The study evaluates clinical and radiographic outcomes, focusing on apical, angular, coronal, and depth linear deviations using post-operative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) superimposition.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- "Computer-Guided vs Freehand Zygomatic Implant Placement#847424
- Dental Implants Placed by Using a Drill Guide Versus Non-guided Placement. Follow-up Study#828907
- Evaluation of the Accuracy of Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrew Placement.#872429
- Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios#813519
- Treatment of Single Maxillary Gingival Recession With Loss of Inter-dental Attachment. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial#827405
Record · ID 1031823
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive