ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Automated Closed-Loop Versus Restrictive Fluid Therapy in Abdominal Surgery
The aim of this study is to compare hemodynamic variables and outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic and/or robotic elective abdominal surgery. Patients will receive either an automated closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) guided by non-invasive flow monitoring or a restrictive fluid therapy of 4ml/kg/h.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group 2001#444868
- The UGIRA International Registry for RAMIG for Gastric Cancer#1162382
- Efferent Loop Stimulation Previous to Ileostomy Closure. Ileostim Trial.#918756
- Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy#1138094
- Stroke Volume Variation- Guided Hemodynamic Therapy Versus Oxygen Extraction Ratio-guided Hemodynamic Therapy#872592
Record · ID 1032044
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive