ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy (PNT) vs Percutaneous Ultrasonic Needle Tenotomy (PUT) for Gluteal Tendinosis
The goal of this study is to determine if a newer tenotomy technique utilizing an ultrasound needle is more effective than the traditional tenotomy technique utilizing a simple hypodermic needle for gluteal tendinosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is pain from the gluteal tendinosis improved with either technique, and, if so, is there a difference in the improvement between techniques? 2. Is there an improvement in function for gluteal tendinosis, and, if so, is there a difference between techniques?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Proximal Versus Distal Superior Cluneal Nerve Block in Entrapment Neuropathy#1032685
- Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Axillary Nerve Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Forearm Block in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery#1125399
- Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Small & Medium Joint Arthrocentesis#851891
- Assisted Nerve Blocks#1096361
- the Effect of Minimally Invasive Technique Assisted by Magnetic Resonance Neurography#877867
Record · ID 1033134
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive