ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
RCT of the Cutting Balloon Versus a High Pressure Balloon for the Treatment of Arteriovenous Fistula Stenoses
The proposed study will investigate the efficacy of the peripheral cutting balloon (PBC) compared to the high pressure balloon in dilating venous stenosis in hemodialysis fistulas. 2\. SPECIFIC AIMS Study endpoints will be: Primary Endpoint 1\. Primary and assisted patency at 6 months Secondary Endpoints: 1. Procedure effectiveness/residual stenosis 2. Procedure-related complications 3. Primary patency and primary assisted patency 12 months 4. Secondary patency at 6 and 12 months 5. Number/type of secondary interventions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis Using the End-to-side Anastomotic Technique vs. Piggyback.#852845
- Peripheral Scoring Drug-coated Balloon in the Treatment of Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis#893732
- Reducing Hemodialysis Catheter Use in Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients#845214
- Optimizing Access Surgery In Senior Hemodialysis Patients#913950
- Drug Coated Balloons vs Plain Balloons for the Management of Dysfunctional Dialysis Fistula#1072995
Record · ID 1033282
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive