ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube
This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration : A Prospective Study#838923
- Tracheal Ultrasound for Confirmation of ETT Placement in NICU#1074374
- A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident#1101781
- Effect of Jaw Thrust on Endotracheal Intubation Using a Videolaryngoscope#873039
- Is Endotracheal Tube Use Mandatory in Patients Undergoing Nasal Septum Surgery?#1074057
Record · ID 1033304
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive