arXiv (All)
open access
FCA-Guided Counterfactual Explanations for Multi-Modal Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Framework Achieving Perfect Validity with Emergent Sparsity
Deep learning models for multi-modal breast cancer diagnosis achieve high predictive accuracy but remain clinically unacceptable without actionable, counterfactual explanations. Attribution-based methods (LIME, SHAP) are categorically inapplicable to this purpose, as they generate no alternative ins
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Achieving High Accuracy in Breast Cancer Diagnosis with CNN#301419
- scDEFT: A deep learning framework for drug-effect prediction and counterfactual reasoning#997812
- Using interpretable machine learning to analyze the trajectory changes of serum albumin to predict the mortality rate of sepsis: a cohort study based on MIMIC-IV.#1097879
- MedDiME: Efficient Latent Diffusion with Adaptive Masking for Medical Counterfactual Generation#1109627
- How Faithful Is Attribution for Sales Forecasting? A Counterfactual Study#971463
Record · ID 1033845
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive