arXiv (All)
open access
Cross-Modal Attention Acts as a Frequency Filter: Why Verbose Prompts Improve Robustness in Vision-Language Models
Vision-language models (VLMs) are fragile under image corruption. We find that the wording of the question affects VLMs in two opposite ways. Verbose questions make VLMs substantially more robust---e.g., rephrasing "Is there a cat?" into "Please look carefully and answer: is there a cat?". Conversel
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Knowing to Abstaining: Bridging the Representation-Action Gap in Vision-Language Models#1116984
- Don't Send What You Don't Need: Question-Guided Token Pruning as a Privacy Defense for Vision-Language Models#1109649
- It's Not What the Image Shows: Irrelevant Context Destabilises VLM Judges Without Informing Them#1142170
- Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery#974439
- MoGround: Measuring and Mitigating Modality Distraction in Vision-Language Models#1118143
Record · ID 1033913
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive