arXiv (All)
open access
greCAPTCHA: Assessing Understanding as Evidence of Research Authorship Under Generative AI
Conferences, journals, funders, schools, and universities are struggling with a surge of potentially AI-generated submissions from ostensibly human authors, who may not have exercised sufficient human oversight for their manuscripts. In turn, institutions evaluating submissions can no longer reliabl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- greCAPTCHA: Assessing Understanding as Evidence of Research Authorship Under Generative AI#978475
- Keystroke Data and Human Editing History - Notes from a coffee shop, Out of Tune Yet Meaningful, 3iATLAS Prophecies - Proof of human authorship#614834
- Generative AI-Driven Publishing Transformation: A GAIP Framework for Human–AI Co-Creation and Dynamic Value Generation in the Publishing Ecosystem#687595
- XtraGPT: Context-Aware and Controllable Academic Paper Revision via Human-AI Collaboration#160882
- Slopaganda: The interaction between propaganda and generative AI#118794
Record · ID 1034298
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive