arXiv (All)
open access
Bidirectional Code Reuse in Software Redesign: An Action Research Study of Static Analyzers
Software redesign preserves functionality while improving quality attributes, but manual reuse of code and tests is costly and error-prone, especially in cross-repository redesigns. Focusing on static analyzers where cross-repository redesign needs often arise, we conduct a bidirectional study of th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- WebDesignIter: Co-Evolving Design Knowledge for Repository-Level Front-End Code Generation#363334
- Temporal Validity on Real Software Histories: Eliminating Stale-Fact Errors in Code-Assistant Memory over GitHub Fixes#659244
- Temporal Validity on Real Software Histories: Eliminating Stale-Fact Errors in Code-Assistant Memory over GitHub Fixes#657108
- Temporal Validity on Real Software Histories: Eliminating Stale-Fact Errors in Code-Assistant Memory over GitHub Fixes#480129
- Investigating Code Reuse in Software Redesign: A Case Study#6039
Record · ID 1034722
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive