arXiv (All)
open access
The Refutation Gap: Certifying Both Halves of an Optimality Claim
Synthesis pipelines increasingly claim not just that a program is correct, but that it is optimal. Such a claim has two halves with radically different verification stories. The upper bound, "a program of size m exists", is witnessed by an artifact that can be re-executed, proved equivalent to its s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Role of Causality in Algorithmic Recourse#414095
- The Adaptive Blindspot: How Efficiency Pruning Can Make Advanced Systems More Fragile#722474
- Algorithmic Microaggressions#730288
- 50 U.S.C. § 2538b — Stockpile responsiveness program#599529
- Revisiting Code Debloating with Ground Truth-based Evaluation#120588
Record · ID 1034848
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive