arXiv (All)
open access
(Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code
AI coding assistants are rapidly transforming software development, but are known to produce insecure code. Prior work has measured whether AI-assisted developers produce secure code, but less is known about how they evaluate AI-generated code: whether they can identify vulnerabilities, what cues th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- (Don't) Trust, but (Don't) Verify: Developers' Attention to Security in AI-Generated Code#1006807
- CodeRoninS-AI: Developing Social Engineering Attacks using Artificial Intelligence#443459
- Understanding the Impact of AI Code Assistants on Security API Usage: An Empirical Study#363321
- From Preventive to Reactive: How AI Coding Assistants Transform Developers' Security Awareness#222557
- How Agentic AI Coding Assistants Become the Attacker's Shell#224396
Record · ID 1034990
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive