arXiv (All)
open access
Chinese Competitive Debating Dataset and Benchmark
Debate adjudication requires tracking how arguments develop through interaction, yet existing datasets rarely combine fine-grained debate transcripts with professional judgments collected during real competitions under a shared rubric. We introduce a dataset and benchmark for evaluating large langua
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Chinese Competitive Debating Dataset and Benchmark#1006911
- AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation#1134026
- Annotation for computational argumentation analysis: Issues and perspectives#823895
- The Impact of Synthetic Data Augmentation on Discourse-Pragmatic Function Classification#926550
- Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation#679244
Record · ID 1036032
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive