arXiv (All)
open access
Rethinking Human-Aligned Evaluation: An Analysis of Semantic Metrics Beyond WER
Word Error Rate (WER), the most commonly used metric for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), treats every lexical deviation from the reference as equally costly, regardless of whether it changes meaning. This raises the question: does WER actually track how humans judge ASR transcript quality? We in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Look Less, Hear Better: Jointly Rewarded GRPO for Streaming ASR#1012522
- An Evaluation Framework for Structured Audio Captions Validated by Controlled Perturbations#1077922
- To Trust or Not to Trust: Retrieval-Augmented Fact Checking in Speech#1078298
- The Hidden Cost of Digits: Number Normalization and WER in ASR Systems#1035054
- Word Timestamps and Speaker Attribution with a Non-Autoregressive LLM#1109263
Record · ID 1036056
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive