arXiv (All)
open access
Moral Entropy: Auditing Bias and Uncertainty in Moral Judgment
Most work in computational ethics treats annotator disagreement on moral content as noise to be voted away, collapsed into majority vote or the more permissive any-annotator rule the moment a single annotator flags an item. We argue this uncertainty should instead be modeled and learned from. We i
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Waywardism: A Non-Dogmatic Philosophy for Moral Life A Framework for Distributed Ethical Reasoning#80149
- Tolerance-Based Fairness Auditing: Violation Certification and Sensitivity Screening#1155940
- In Defense of Moral Evidentialism#764641
- On the computational complexity of ethics: moral tractability for minds and machines#96227
- Ethics-based auditing to develop trustworthy AI#754269
Record · ID 1036380
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive