arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying Trade-Offs Between Stability and Goal-Obfuscation
Safety-critical autonomy in adversarial settings demands more than Lyapunov stability of tracking error signals. An agent executing a goal-directed trajectory is intrinsically legible to a passive observer running online Bayesian inference, because the contractive dynamics of any Lyapunov basin of a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Dual-Adversarial Safety Alignment: Cultivating Intrinsic Threat Comprehension in LRMs#441681
- Cognitive Sovereignty in Algorithmic Societies: A Methodological Framework for Reclaiming Human Agency#93835
- Position: AI Safety Requires Effective Controllability#229554
- Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics#776124
- Containment Verification: AI Safety Guarantees Independent of Alignment#175347
Record · ID 1036694
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive