arXiv (All)
open access
Performance vs Consistency: Evaluating a Foundation Model in Lung-RADS Screening
Foundation models have recently demonstrated strong capabilities across a wide range of medical imaging tasks. However, their performance in structured clinical interpretation settings remains insufficiently explored. In lung cancer screening, interpretative variability persists despite standardized
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Use and impact of risk-based eligibility models in low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review.#427684
- Optimizing Bronchopulmonary Cancer Screening#875663
- Annotating anatomy and pathology in the National Lung Screening Trial computed tomography images#997834
- CT Scans in Screening for Lung Cancer in Current and Former Smokers#861118
- Performance and Interpretation of Lung Scintigraphy#685126
Record · ID 1036964
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive