arXiv (All)
open access
Toward Well-Posed Problems in the Social Sciences: Hadamard's Criteria as Epistemic Guardrails
We develop an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the epistemic robustness of social-scientific inquiry through Hadamard's criteria for well-posed problems: existence, uniqueness, and stability. Reinterpreting these criteria not as demands for deterministic certainty but as methodological gua
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- De la subordinación a la hegemonía. Sobre la legitimación epistemológica de las matemáticas en la filosofía natural en el siglo XVII#757672
- Diagnosing the Social Deficit in Computational Social Science: A Pilot Audit of Epistemic Drift#240550
- Skepticism about Induction#776705
- Unknowing as Necessity: The "Problem" of Epistemic Luck... Something to "Solve," or to Accept as... Necessary?#100188
- Russell's Scientific Realism#97448
Record · ID 1037004
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive