arXiv (All)
open access
The Wisdom of Artificial Deliberative Crowds
The aggregation of many lay estimates often outperforms individual expert judgment, a phenomenon known as the wisdom of crowds. While this is usually attributed to the independence of estimates, an even stronger effect arises through deliberation: averaging the consensus estimates of small deliberat
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Collective Estimation: Accuracy, Expertise, and Extroversion as Sources of Intra-Group Influence#168618
- Trust the crowd: Crowdsourced fact-checking is as effective at reducing confidence in misinformation as expert fact-checking#209830
- Collective problem decomposition improves the wisdom of deliberative crowds.#653480
- Collective problem decomposition improves the wisdom of deliberative crowds#154975
- When Expert Disagreement Supports the Consensus#733919
Record · ID 1037180
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive