arXiv (All)
open access
Why Do Pull Requests Go Silent? Uncovering the Barriers to Contribution Completion in Open-Source Code Review
Pull requests (PRs) underpin pull-based software development by enabling distributed code review and collaborative contribution in open-source projects. Yet many become inactive before integration and are eventually abandoned or closed, wasting contributor and maintainer effort. Although prior work
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Do Pull Requests Go Silent? Uncovering the Barriers to Contribution Completion in Open-Source Code Review#1028782
- The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics#178943
- From Metrics to Improvement: A Lifecycle-Aware LLM Feedback Framework for Research Software Quality#482200
- Empirical Study on the Characteristics and Evolution of AI-usage in GitHub Repositories: Evidence from Code Comments#266245
- What's Inside a GitHub Repository? An Empirical Study on the Contents of 10K Projects#200580
Record · ID 1037308
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive