arXiv (All)
open access
From Capability to Assurance in Autonomous Penetration-Testing Harnesses: A Framework and Reference Implementation
Research on large language model agents for penetration testing is evaluated almost entirely by capability: whether the agent captures a flag or reproduces a proof of concept. That metric suits a benchmark but is silent on the properties that decide whether an autonomous agent can be used in an auth
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Staying on the Attack Path: Structured State for Long-Horizon Automated Penetration Testing#984272
- The A-R Behavioral Space: Execution-Level Profiling of Tool-Using Language Model Agents in Organizational Deployment#13172
- Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models#665785
- Same Payload, Different Channel: Measuring Trust Asymmetry in Tool-Using Language Models#664285
- ACF: A Collaborative Framework for Agent Covert Communication under Cognitive Asymmetry#2446
Record · ID 1037347
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive