arXiv (All)
open access
Validity of MMRM-based hypothesis testing under missing-not-at-random mechanisms
In randomized clinical trials with longitudinal continuous outcomes, missing-not-at-random (MNAR) missingness often motivates conservative alternatives to mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM). Such caution is important for estimation, but estimation and testing need not require identical assump
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies 01 Mathematical Sciences#1005314
- Parametric MMD Estimation with Missing Values: Robustness to Missingness and Data Model Misspecification#1122913
- Single-Item Reliability for Intensive Longitudinal Data: A Three-Level Linear Mixed-Effect Autoregressive Modeling Approach#297823
- A comparison of covariate adjustment approaches under model misspecification in individually randomized trials#231913
- Clinical characteristics of included randomised controlled trials#181834
Record · ID 1037369
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive