arXiv (All)
open access
Characterizing Feedback Statements in Machine Learning Jupyter Notebooks
Machine learning development in Jupyter notebooks is iterative and feedback-driven. Practitioners author statements that reveal information about program execution and use it to decide what to do next. We call these feedback statements and identify two forms: exploratory statements that display valu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Characterizing Feedback Statements in Machine Learning Jupyter Notebooks#1028778
- Beneath the Diff: Diagnosing and Mitigating Algorithmic Mode Collapse in Code-Level Autonomous Research Loops#819554
- Beneath the Diff: Diagnosing and Mitigating Algorithmic Mode Collapse in Code-Level Autonomous Research Loops#809558
- dalex: Responsible Machine Learning with Interactive Explainability and\n Fairness in Python#203237
- CoRE: A Fine-Grained Code Reasoning Benchmark Beyond Output Prediction#141559
Record · ID 1037595
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive