arXiv (All)
open access
Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance across various tasks, prompting researchers to develop diverse evaluation benchmarks. However, most benchmarks typically measure the ability of LLMs to respond to individual questions, neglecting the complex interactions in real-world a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Choices Speak Louder than Questions#1131383
- Evaluating Large Language Model Performance on Open-Ended Questions: Answering and Marking Capabilities#1180066
- What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Survey#1049587
- Human-Anchored Inference for Ranking New Models with Large Language Model Judges#1014189
- When Does Memory Help? A Cost-Aware Evaluation of Long-Term Memory in Tool-Using LLM Agents#972506
Record · ID 1037686
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive