Lancaster EPrints
metadata only
Gene week: a novel way of consulting the public.
Within academic circles, the “deficit” model of public understanding of science has been subject to increasing critical scrutiny by those who favor more constructivist approaches. These suggest that “the public” can articulate sophisticated ideas about the social and ethical implications of science
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Eugenic Thinking#777267
- The human genome as public: Justifications and implications#724706
- Can ‘eugenics’ be defended?#715159
- Science as Social Existence: Heidegger and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge#745720
- Beyond Truth: From Epistemic Situatedness to Scientific Ethics as Method"#103759
Record · ID 1039553
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive